I haven’t ever really been a fan of Apple, especially since they limit expandability (e.g. support for memory cards in the iPhone). Granted, Apple “stuff” (e.g. software) works well and that’s a major reason for people loving what Apple produces. That being said, as I watched the phenomenal mega biggy uber long crazy tennis Wimbledon match this morning I saw an Apple commercial highlighting the new iPhone’s ability to cut, copy, and paste. I laughed. Are you kidding me? This is a feature worthy of a commercial? My Blackberry has had the copy and paste feature for over 2 years. Here’s the commercial showing “incredible things”:
This is part 2 for me as I did it back in my early NW days (1998). This is a 202 mile bike ride from U of Washington to downtown Portland. This year was good weather, albeit a bit hot. This time I rode the course with Trent and Justin – both very strong riders. We took a train up to Seattle on Fri night and got in late (bridge issue) – ended up getting to bed at 1am and alarm went of at 330am. Ugh. We pacelined most of the race save near the end when I suggested they move fwd. as they had more energy left than me. The climbing was a bit surprising. It was a bit more climbing (~5000 ft. in gain) than when I last did it in 1998 on the good ole Centurion – see:Cascade Bicycle Club Message Boards – but still fun nonetheless. Race info: http://www.cascade.org/EandR/stp/STP_Details.cfm
Oregon Velo � Blog Archive » Photos: Cross Crusade’s Hillsboro Stadium It was a muddy and cold weekend in Portland… so why not join in on a bike race! After looking at the photos at the link above I am not quite sure why I do this (I acutally pay people to enter these things), other than it begets the worst and best feelings I have each week… more so the latter. Cyclocross racing in the mud, rain, and even snow in the fall is similar to what the winter’s snow is to me, fun (although there is no comparison to snow). The other cool part is it’s a chance to meet more crazy and fun people.
I found a page that explains how to increase the transmission range of the speed sensor. I found this while looking for an explanation as to why my speed sensor was perhaps acting up. Today I went for a loooong road bike ride and when I downloaded my data from the watch I noticed the speed was sporadic in terms of taking measurements (i.e. there were gaps in the graph/data). While I changed the jumper I figured I should change the battery as well since it’s a pain to get to and it’s been a while since it was last replaced (perhaps another reason for the sporadic performance of the sensor).
So I am kind of in the market for a new watch. I currently have the Polar S720i and Garmin Foretrex 101 (for “big” open ocean kayaking inter-island trips and long backpacking trips) watch which has most of the features I want EXCEPT speed/distance measurement via a “pod” and/or a GPS functionality. The sports this thing will have to support are biking, kayaking, skiing, blading, mountaineering, and running (trail < -- important consideration when using GPS based systems). After some initial research I narrowed my search down to three vendors (the "short list") - Polar, Suunto, and Garmin. The watch requirements were of course in conflict, so it came down to balancing/weightings for what would be best. No, I didn't create an xls for this one, I managed most of the weightings and scores in my head.
The Polar S625x or S725x is probably the one to upgrade too if I had to right now, but I think I will wait until the "next" thing comes out in this space as most of these watches have been out a while now. The Garmin 305 would have won, but the battery life (only 10 hrs then requires a recharge) knocked it out of the running. The Suunto T6 was knocked out because the foot pod sensor isn't waterproof/resistant, even though they supply a case for it (for another $10 of course, which is cheap considering the whole setup goes for $500+). Not too mention the Suunto software wasn't as good for analytical purposes as the Polar software (Garmin wasn't so strong in the software category either). None of these watches are that far off for what I am looking for, but when it comes to dropping $500 and the fact that I already have a decent watch, these "little" things kill the deal for now.
The summary is I am going to hold out for a watch that has:
decent profile (not too heavy or large on the wrist)
heart rate monitor (for training, albeit, I don’t like that word much)
distance/speed measurements (this will help me nail down my pace in my head so during AR’s I can accurately estimate the team’s pace, and thus distance – useful for navigating with a compass)
altimeter (required for AR’s, unless banned of course)
waterproof (including all accessories – e.g. bike mount/measurements and speed/distance pods)
bike integration (need one watch for my tri’s and AR’s)
ideally a GPS option with the foot pod option too (like the Garmin 305 Forerunner) – that way I can use the foot pod if training/racing in the woods and the GPS for open water/trail use
good coding technology (so the sensors – e.g. bike, heart rate, and speed/distance pod send data without error to the watch)
Infrared/cable (USB) PC and software integration for tracking/analysis purposes
Battery life of at least 10 days (required for multi-day expedition trips and/or races)
